Case 11_94

11_94 interference 94. However, for the reasons elaborated above in the context of Article 9 (Art. 9) of the Convention, the Commission finds that, even assuming there has been an interference with the applicants' rights under Article 11 para. 1 (Art. 11-1) of the Convention, interference was prescribed by law and necessary in a democratic society for the prevention of disorder or crime, or the protection of the rights and freedoms of others, within the meaning of Article 11 para. 2 (Art. 11-2) of the Convention. It follows that this part of the application is also manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 27 para. 2 (Art. 27-2) of the Convention.