192_33 interference 33. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that the dispersal of the public assembly on 16 October 2006 and the arrest of the third, fourth, fifth and sixth applicants were not “necessary in a democratic society”.