196_64 interference 64. The applicants in applications nos. 37565/08, 37581/08, 42250/08, and 39189/09 complained about the restrictions imposed by the authorities on the location, time or manner of conduct of the public events, as well as the allegedly unlawful arrest of Mr Nagibin and Mr Nikolayev during some of those public events (see appended table). They relied, expressly or in substance, on Articles 10 and 11 of the Convention. These complaints fall to be examined under Article 11 (see Lashmankin and Others v. Russia, nos. 57818/09 and 14 others, §§ 363-65, 7 February 2017), except for application no. 39189/09 where the applicant complained about his arrest at NAGIBIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA JUDGMENT 10the solo demonstration and subsequent conviction, which falls be examined under Article 10 of the Convention. Articles 10 and 11 of the Convention read as follows: Article 10 “