Case 228_45
228_45 interference
45. The Court reiterates that an interference does not need to amount to
an outright ban, legal or de facto, but can consist in various other measures
taken by the authorities. The term “restrictions” in Article 11 § 2 must be
interpreted as including both measures taken before or during an assembly,
such as a prior ban, dispersal of the rally or the arrest of participants, and
those, such as punitive measures, taken afterwards, including penalties
imposed for having taken part in a rally (see, among other authorities,
Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, § 100, ECHR
2015).