Case 240_44
240_44 interference
44. The Court reiterates that an interference does not need to amount to
an outright ban, legal or de facto, but can consist of various other measures
taken by the authorities. The term “restrictions” in Article 11 § 2 must be
interpreted as including both measures taken before or during an assembly,
such as a prior ban, dispersal of the rally or the arrest of participants, and
those, such as punitive measures, taken afterwards, including penalties
imposed for having taken part in a rally (see Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia,
no. 76204/11, § 51, 4 December 2014, and Kudrevičius and Others, cited
above, § 100).