305_10 interference 10. As regards the Government’s objection regarding the alleged lack of victim status of the applicant, the Court observes that the applicant was arrested, detained on remand and subsequently convicted of having attended a demonstration. Thus, he was deprived of his liberty within the context of the criminal proceedings brought against him. The decision suspending the execution of the judgment neither acknowledged nor afforded redress for the BAT v. TÜRKİYE JUDGMENT 3alleged breach of the applicant’s right to freedom of assembly. The Court therefore finds that, the applicant did not lose his victim status to complain of a breach of Article 11 on account of his conviction.