48_88 interference 88. The applicants disagree with the Government. They refer in particular to the findings of the Law Commission, and underline that the Law Commission was considerably stronger in its condemnation of the concept of contra bonos mores than of the notion of breach of the peace. They point to the very real danger of magistrates, who are untrained laymen, adjudging conduct contra bonos mores when they subjectively disapprove of it. They do not accept that an order not to act contra bonos mores can be a formality which is prescribed by law, because it does not state what behaviour is not permitted, and add that it is impossible to know what may trigger breach proceedings: it may well be behaviour which is not even a civil tort.