Case 572_7
572_7 interference
7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures
taken against them as participants of public assemblies, namely the dispersal
of these assemblies, as well as their arrest followed by their conviction for
administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11
of the Convention. Some applicants also made the same complaints under
Article 10; however, these complaints fall to be examined under Article 11 of
the Convention.