59_79 interference 79. The Government contest the above complaints. They submit that at no stage before the domestic courts did the applicant rely on Articles 10 and 11 of the Convention, or on arguments to the same or like effect based on domestic law. They point out that the applicant has sufficient guarantees under domestic law for the protection of his rights guaranteed under Articles 10 and 11 of the Convention. They contend therefore that this part of the application should be 32962/96 - 6 - declared inadmissible on account of the applicant’s failure to exhaust domestic remedies, as required by Article 35 § 1 of the Convention.