Case 89_30
89_30 interference
30. The Court notes at the outset that there is no dispute as to the
existence of an interference in the applicant’s right of assembly. This
interference had a legal basis, namely section 22 of Law no. 2911 on
assemblies and marches, and was thus “prescribed by law” within the
meaning of Article 11 § 2 of the Convention. There remains the question
whether the interference pursued a legitimate aim and was necessary in a
democratic society.