93_152 interference 152. The Government submit, firstly, that the applicants failed to produce – in the domestic proceedings or before this Court – any evidence in support of their allegation that the meeting had been disrupted. According to their submissions, the first applicant, when asked to produce documents showing the lawfulness of the community meeting, realised that “the meeting should not be carried out”* and indicated the congregation that the meeting should end. Secondly, they assert that the founding documents of the Jehovah's