### Lack of Accessibility in Legal Proceedings

#General Observations

The lack of clear and accessible evidence can undermine the fairness of proceedings and the accessibility of the law (42_144, 163_25, 167_21, 168_21, 594_95). The Court has emphasized the importance of procedural fairness, including the presumption of innocence (42_144, 163_25, 167_21, 168_21).

#Applications

1. **Cases of Inaccessibility**:
- **Absence of Effective Remedy**: The Court found a violation of Article 13 due to the absence of an effective domestic remedy, as the judicial remedy available to the organizers of public events was post-hoc and could not provide adequate redress (227_13).
- **Failure to Meet Quality of Law Requirements**: In some cases, the Court found that legal provisions did not meet the Convention’s “quality of law” requirements, leading to unlawful interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly (293_9, 466_50).
- **Dismissal Without Examination**: The Police Department dismissed the applicant’s notification without examining it on the merits, which was considered a failure to meet accessibility requirements (357_27).