### Published Laws and Legal Provisions
**Accessibility of Published Laws:**
1. **General Accessibility:**
- Laws published in official gazettes or bulletins, such as the 1967 Travel Order and the USSR Law on Approving Decrees, met the accessibility requirement (
60_106,
60_107,
104_194,
115_147,
119_30,
121_33,
121_34,
121_35,
121_36,
130_26,
138_31,
143_60,
158_38,
180_123,
180_124,
181_76,
195_28,
195_29).
2. **Specific Laws and Acts:**
- **Laws nos. 5237, 3713, and 2911:** These laws were accessible, and the decision of 4 March 2008, although not published in the Official Gazette, was available on the Internet (
256_107).
- **Populated Localities Development Act and Automobile Roads Act:** The manifestation organized by the applicant was dispersed based on a judicial order issued under these Acts, which were published and accessible to the general public (
235_41).
- **Public Assembly Act 1992:** This Act provided detailed provisions regarding the organization and holding of public assemblies, including the requirement for applications to be submitted to local authorities and the conditions under which assemblies could be prohibited (
248_112,
248_113,
248_114,
248_115,
248_116).
- **Law no. 60/1991 on Public Gatherings:** The relevant provisions of this law were cited in a case, suggesting that the law was accessible and provided a clear legal basis for regulating public gatherings (
414_84,
414_85).
3. **Notification Requirements:**
- Advance written notification was required to agree upon the place, time, and route of an assembly, enabling the relevant local executive authority to make necessary arrangements. This was outlined in Article 5 of the Law on Freedom of Assembly (
380_44).
4. **Clear Legal Provisions:**
- The Court found that the interference was "prescribed by law" when it was based on clear legal provisions, such as Article 173 of the CAO. This provision was deemed accessible and allowed individuals to foresee the consequences of their actions (
598_54).
5. **Criminal Code Provisions:**
- The Criminal Code provision cited in snippet
615_21 is an example of a law that meets the accessibility requirement. It clearly states the penalties for preventing the lawful exercise of freedom to assemble or demonstrate, or for seriously disturbing the proceedings of a lawful assembly or demonstration. The penalties are specified based on the nature of the acts (violence or illegal means), making it sufficiently clear for individuals to understand the legal consequences of their actions (
615_21).